Opinion: The democratic race has forgotten its purpose



What we had feared the most has come to pass. A senile, raving, gaffe-prone dotard has well-nigh won the democratic presidential nomination to run against Trump in November 2020. At the end of a fratricidal race that pitted candidates without major differences in their policy agendas (with the exception of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren) against each other, the contestant who was until recently thought to be the least likely to win the nomination has wound up clinching it. Pundits who wrote off Joe Biden after his poor showing in Iowa and New Hampshire can now eat their words.

Even more dispiriting is the fact that Biden crushed Bernie Sanders in Michigan to emerge as the clear front-runner. Sanders’s momentum that seemed to be rife after his stellar performance in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada has fizzled out. The fateful Super Tuesday that tipped the scales in Biden’s favour took the momentum away from Sanders.

What explains Biden’s appeal? Did the democratic electorate genuinely think Biden would be the best candidate to defeat Trump? A man who supported the Iraq war in 2003 and later lied that he did not do so, someone who ‘did not think’ Hosni Mubarak was a dictator, who lied that he was arrested in South Africa, who does not offer any attractive policy on either domestic or foreign policy would be well-positioned to beat Trump? Seriously? Simply put, Biden is uninspiring and represents continuity rather than change. But his victory is due less to his favourability among voters than to their aversion to his opponent, Bernie Sanders. 

Sanders was portrayed by the extreme-right and centre-right media as an extreme socialist who stood no chance of winning the nomination. A flurry of questions were asked regarding the viability of his ‘Medicare For All’ policy. When he proved his critics wrong with impressive victories initially in the race, the naysayers were infuriated. Now, with Biden’s resurgence, the Sanders critics are heaving a sigh of relief.

The persistent hounding of a doughty candidate with a revolutionary agenda and the nomination of a bumbling and incoherent man brings to relief one clear problem with this democratic race: everyone lost sight of the purpose of this whole exercise.

The democratic presidential primary is meant to nominate a candidate who is most capable of defeating Trump in the presidential elections. Its goal is to dislodge a narcissistic, egomaniacal and dangerous person from the seat of power. Rather than focussing on that, the race became a spectacle unto itself. The overarching mindset of experts, media and onlookers became not to get rid of Trump but to get rid of Sanders. Whether he was capable of beating Trump, did not matter. It did not matter either whether the alternative candidate was better positioned than Sanders to beat Trump. They simply wanted Sanders to go. This pathological aversion to Sanders was also demonstrated by candidates who dropped out of the race and pledged their support to Biden, against whom, hypocritically, they had a host of reservations while they were in the race. 

Now that Sanders is really gone, his detractors can rejoice and celebrate. But they have to get ready for another four years of bluster, incompetence, lies and erosion of democratic values.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Resolving ethno-national conflicts: Contested Lands by Sumantra Bose

Image
Introduction Ethno-national conflicts are amongst the most powerful and persistent features of global politics. The pattern usually is one side attempts to establish complete dominion over a part of its territory populated by a different people who view it as alien intrusion into their homeland. The stronger side responds to dissent with repression deepening the hostility harboured by the repressed against their oppressor and sparking in them an urge to break away. This urge transforms over time into a staunch demand for freedom and self-determination. Mutual antagonism then breaks out into an all-out war which doesn’t end immediately, but prolongs for many years and even decades.  If one probes into the reasons behind the instances of many ethno-national wars across the world, one finds that in several cases two peoples who define themselves in opposition to each other are forced to live together. Most of these (although not all) occur in the post-colonial world where the colonial mas
Read more

Analysis: Iran protests 2019

Pressing sanctions and recalcitrant mullahs In the throes of a threat to his country’s designs to dominate the region, Ayatollah Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, countenanced a sharp rise in the price of a commodity that Iranians hitherto obtained for a pittance: petrol. What happened next? All hell broke loose. As though fate hadn’t been sufficiently unkind to Iran, this move came in the backdrop of widespread protests in Lebanon and Iraq, both of them countries in which Iran has made deep inroads. Iran’s proxy group Hezbollah, political party and militant organisation, wields considerable clout in Lebanon. Iraq, as revealed by documents recently leaked to The Intercept, has come under Iran’s sway ever since U.S. troops left the country in 2011. While the causes of these protests are mainly economic, they are also seen as fulminations against the sinister influence of Iran in Iraq and Lebanon. Economic woes The reason this step was taken at such an unpropitious moment can
Read more

Indian Summer - The Secret History of the End of an Empire, A Review

Image
Photo courtesy: Amazon.co.uk Indians hold passionate views about the leaders of their anti-colonial struggle. Most are reverential and the foremost figure in the liberation movement pantheon, Mohandas Gandhi, commands the kind of devotion that is generally reserved for a divinely ordained prophet. The fulsome titles “Father of the Nation” and “Mahatma” or Great Soul speak to the unquestioning veneration of a man who is considered a saintly paragon of virtue. Mohammad Ali Jinnah is similarly glorified in Pakistan (which was also part of erstwhile British India), although with relatively less melodrama. He is known as “Qaid-e Azam” or the Great Leader. Extolling the founding fathers of their countries, however, does not incline people of either country to live by the principles that they fought and stood for. Pakistan is worlds apart from the secular republic that the Qaid-e Azam imagined. Intolerance towards minorities, violence against women and a sham democracy characterise present-da
Read more